Buddha who?
I'm reading an essay I found on Japanese Journal of Relgious Studies archive page. Now and again, I take a crack at making sense of Japan's Buddhist heritage. It's telling when scholars studying Buddhism in Japan premise their work on looking for "signs of life" in the tradition. It's grim, as Gerald Cooke notes in his 1974 treatment "Traditional Buddhist Sects and Modernization in Japan", that Buddhist sects were dead. He talks about how Japanese Buddhist temples are essentially funeral parlours serving no other meaningful purpose for the people. Wow.
My neighbour lady in Uwajima was attending Jodo Shinshu temple with her husband in preparation for the next life. Old people look at it as a necessity, young people see it as an artifact here in Japan. Why'd it happen? Blame the Meiji Restoration in the 1800s when the government instituted Shinto as the state religion and took power from the temples. The powers codified Shinto, told people to stop paying respects at their Buddhist altars, abolished some holidays and conflated some others with secular and Shinto ones, and required people to do the Shinto thing as a religious and national gesture of respect. It didn't last long, and Buddha bounced back, but not to his original splendour.
Why do you, western reader, know about Buddhism? You can pretty much credit one man, D.T. Suzuki, for the spread of Buddhist, especially Zen, ideas to the western world. Last year, the documentary D. T. Suzuki - a Zen Life was screened in Tokyo to a receptive audience. He described himself as primarily scholar, but surfed the line between egghead and practitioner, never taking vows to become a priest.
What to do? Get this, two Buddhist priests at a Tokyo club are reciting sutras once a month to get people interested. Well, that's one way to do it.
It's so weird. Only in Japan can monks and priests get married and eat meat. I'm going to check the university library for Neither Monks nor Laymen, a more recent book about the state of Buddhism.





Recent Comments